HOME | ABOUT US | CONTACT US
YOUR INTERACTIVE MAGAZINE
REALTOR.ORG/realtormag
.

Main

A Much-Improved Home Buyer Incentive

By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine

Trying to get details yesterday on what House and Senate conferees did and didn't include in the $790 billion economic stimulus legislation working its way through Congress was a challenge--and not just for those of us who don't work on Capitol Hill. The back-and-forth of negotiations was so rapid-fire that it seemed no single office had the conclusive take on what would be in the final bill.

With the dust having settled somewhat, NAR analysts say the bill contains several NAR-backed changes to the home buyer tax credit, including an increase in its size, from a maximum $7,500 to a maximum $8,000 ($4,000 for married households filing separately). News reports had conflicting takes on this yesterday, with some identifying the $8,000 limit and others saying it remained at $7,500.

In any case, one of NAR's top priorities for the tax credit was to get the repayment feature removed, and the conference report does that, for home purchases in 2009. Buyers also have to hold onto the house for at least three years. That's a safeguard against speculators.

NAR also wanted the life of the credit expanded, and the conferees provided that by making the credit available for all of 2009. Right now it's set to terminate at the end of June.

A couple of things remain the same. One, the credit remains refundable, which means you can get the balance of the credit sent to you in a check from the federal government if your credit exceeds your tax liability. And two, if your buy a house this year, you can elect to claim the credit on your 2008 tax return. That enables you to realize the benefit on your taxes as soon as possible.

If both the House and the Senate pass the final bill today, as they've been talking about, and if President Barack Obama signs the legislation into law by Monday, we could know by Tuesday the final details of the tax credit and other pieces of the legislation that REALTORS® have been advocating for, including the increase in conforming and FHA high-cost loan limits.

Keeping Up With Credit Scores

By Wendy Cole, Senior Editor REALTOR® Magazine

Who isn't worried about their credit score these days? And the advice coming from the mainstream media, as well as as the blogosphere, for boosting the all-important FICO can sound like it's emanating from the Tower of Babel. Rip up your credit cards! Don't you dare cancel your credit cards!

Now comes word that the rules behind how the FICO is calculated are changing -- now. Some of the modfications actually favor consumers.

But another development in the world of credit scores bodes less well for the public. One of the three major credit reporting bureas, Experian, is going to stop making its data available to consumers in May.



If You had President Obama's Ear

By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® Magazine

President Barack Obama has a lot on his plate but if you could spend a few minutes with him, what idea would you put in his ear to help improve housing markets?

Trulia CEO Pete Flint recently posed that question to readers of the Trulia blog. The closest thing to a consensus opinion among the 28 readers who responded: Get the U.S. Treasury to do what it originally said it would do when it lobbied for the $700 billion in Wall Street rescue funds back in October 2008. As one reader says, "Get the mortgage companies that were given bailout monies to loan that money out to people to start buying."

The fact is, REALTORS® were concerned with banks' intentions from the very beginning. When lawmakers were debating the rescue package, two leaders of our industry—Gary Keller of Keller Williams Realty in Austin, Texas, and Ken Riggs of Real Estate Research Corp. in Chicago—told me and other REALTOR® Magazine editors in a conference call we hosted that bank actions needed to be monitored carefully because banks were under no obligation to pass their money through to borrowers. "Although the intent of the legislation is to free up capital for lending on homes, cars, college, and business inventories, the government doesn't have a mechanism in the bill for making the banks turn around and lend the money back," Keller said at the time. "So no one knows what will actually happen once a bank has its capital freed up."

Here we are several months later, with half of the funds spent, and real estate professionals are still waiting for the banks to plow assistance into credit markets.

Other responses to Flint's blog post fell into three broad categories:

1) Help households become homeowners

2) Help home owners at risk of default stabilize their position

3) Help the industry help itself.

Top among the suggestions for helping households become owners is allowing people to save for a downpayment using tax-free dollars, what one person called a home savings account. Other actions recommended are in line with what NAR has been advocating for months: Increase conforming and FHA high-cost area loan limits, bring down interest rates, and make the homebuyer tax credit a real credit rather than a loan in disguise.

One person said getting interest rates down to 4 percent would make a real difference in getting people off the fence. NAR doesn't advocate aiming for a certain rate—that would encourage prospective buyers to stay on the fence waiting for the target rate—but it did applaud the Federal Reserve's actions last month to begin buying mortgage-backed securities. The move helped bring down rates to just under 5 percent for a time without the Fed having to lower its short-term target rate, which is already just barely above zero.

There were all sorts of suggestions for helping troubled home owners, but a recurring theme throughout was the need for the federal government to get lenders to rethink overly tight underwriting standards and take whatever steps are necessary to get lenders to take loan modifications seriously. Replacement loans with 40- and even 50-year maturities should be an option as well.

Suggestions for the industry to improve itself really don't fall into President Obama's portfolio. Many commenters said the industry must make it harder for practitioners and mortgage brokers to get licensed, but that's a state issue. All the federal government can do is encourage, recommend, or cajole states to take action. Stricter enforcement mechanisms for violations are needed, too, some readers said.

A few people weighed in on the stimulus bill now making its way through Congress. Here the focus needs to be on long-term investment that will produce a real payoff in future increases in economic activity and new jobs. One person pointed to the ideas being generated at a think take called the Davinci Institute, which is touting investment in future-oriented technologies like a national wireless Internet grid, massive data storage libraries, self-navigating on-demand automobile systems, a "whole earth" genealogy project, digital upgrading of community libraries, a space elevator, a transcontinental freeway, and space-based power stations. Few of these ideas have anything to do with real estate but they could conceivably pave the way for the kind of economic expansion that really does growth the pie, making home ownership possible for more people.

FHA Mortgage-Insurance Premium is Prorated

By Robert Freedman, Senior Editor, REALTOR® magazine

An astute reader pointed out a detail we didn't characterize effectively in our "Doing Business in 2009" guide (January 2009, page 29). We talked about FHA as a good alternative for borrowers who are having trouble coming up with the downpayment for some conventional home loan products. With FHA, you can get federally backed financing for 3.5 percent down along with the 1.5 percent insurance fee up-front. FHA also requires borrowers to pay a half-percent insurance premium, with payments due monthly. In our coverage readers might construe that the monthly payment is the entire half-percent but that's not how the fee works; the half-percent is annualized and the fee is prorated over 12 months, so borrowers just pay one-twelfth of the fee each month. That's an important distinction. A half percent fee on a $150,000 mortgage would be $750, a tidy sum, but prorated over 12 months it adds just $62.50 to the monthly payment.

Summers Says Housing Bubble Was Inevitable



Robert Freedman, Senior Editor

The subprime meltdown precipitated the credit crisis that the Bush administration and Congress are now trying to fix with the proposed $700 billion Wall Street bailout, but shifts in global capital flows would have wreaked havoc in the U.S. mortgage market even if subprime lending hadn't gotten out of hand, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers told a housing and mortgage credit forum in Washington on Tuesday.

"Trillions of dollars in surplus capital abroad" were seeking a place to go, he said, and U.S. mortgage-backed securities were one of the top destinations for that money.

As a result, he said, "bubbles" would have formed in the housing market even without the attraction of high-yield securities backed by subprime mortgages. "It's not accurate to say subprime caused this," he said at the forum, hosted by the Brookings Institution.

The problem now, though, is to figure out how to get these mortgage-backed securities--whose values have fallen way below what they were originally priced at--off the balance sheets of financial institutions so they can get recapitalized and start making loans again, said Summers and other speakers at the forum, including Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Chair Sheila Bair.

Summers and Bair agreed the bailout package must be big and quick but Summers warned

Continue reading "Summers Says Housing Bubble Was Inevitable" »

Are You Sidestepping Short Sales?

By Stacey Moncrieff

I had an interesting discussion this week with Phoenix practitioner Jane Brunet, who specializes in short sales. Brokers in her area, she says, are telling their associates to avoid short-sale properties because of the difficulties in getting transactions closed. The transactions are complex. They require a keen understanding of financing, banks' loss mitigation policies, and bankruptcy law, among other things. Brunet says brokers should be providing in-depth education rather than discouraging their associates from engaging in such deals.

The irony of avoiding short sales, of course, is that homeowners with underwater mortgages are then forced into foreclosure leaving houses vacant — never a good thing for real estate values — and the banks gain control of the inventory.

That's a dangerous scenario in Brunet's mind. The conventional wisdom is that banks don’t want to hold REO — it’s costly to them — but Brunet’s not too sure.

Continue reading "Are You Sidestepping Short Sales?" »

FHA Market Share Soars

by Amy Konstas

I learned in the Federal Housing Policy Committee meeting that FHA loans now make up 15-20 percent of the mortgage market. It’s estimated in August these loans may comprise about 40 percent of the entire market. Overall, the FHA culture has changed for the better, and FHA loans are now very valuable business and a good opportunity for REALTORS®.

More borrowers are being reached in terms of eligibility to get a loan, which is good, and the introduction of foreclosure prevention plans by Democrat Senators Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd would also help alleviate trouble within the housing market. But principal reduction must be addressed for loans already underwater.

A Q&A session followed.

Advice for Tough Times: Lead By Example

By John N. Frank

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage took a dramatic step last Thursday to pump up the spirits of 12,000 real estate professionals while also reminding them that Wells want to stay a major force in mortgage lending.
It beamed a live telecast featuring three real estate coaches and the co-president of Wells Home Mortgage, Cara Heiden, to 50 theaters in 29 markets where it had invited real estate pros to watch and listen.

The message – when the going gets tough, the tough have to inspire others to get going.

Continue reading "Advice for Tough Times: Lead By Example" »

Some Lenders Haven't Learned

By Rob Freedman

Last summer, right before the subprime mortgage debacle exploded onto the front page of our newspapers, I had a conversation with Steven Krystofiak, a California mortgage broker who had become so concerned about the widespread use of stated income underwriting in residential mortgage loans that earlier in the year he had launched an organization called Mortgage Brokers Association for Responsible Lending. (www.mbarl.org) The group's sole mission was to publicize the dangers of underwriting loans without requiring borrowers to document their income.

Continue reading "Some Lenders Haven't Learned" »

“Fraud for Homes” Comes Under Greater Scrutiny

By Mariwyn Evans

Just in case you needed a “wowie” figure to make you feel even worse about the credit markets, try this one — mortgage fraud increased 139 percent between 2006 and 2007, according to a presentation I heard yesterday from Merle Sharick of the Mortgage Asset Research Institute. Even scarier is that the huge jump figure is based only on federally regulated lenders and doesn’t count all those state-chartered banks and mortgage brokers backed by private capital sources.

It also surprised me that, according to Sharick, lenders are beginning to pay more attention to what he called “fraud for housing.” Unlike “fraud for money,” which gets most of the attention from the FBI, fraud for housing can be as simple as a real estate practitioner “forgetting” to show

Continue reading "“Fraud for Homes” Comes Under Greater Scrutiny" »

About This Blog

Welcome to Speaking of Real Estate, your opportunity to talk about real estate with the editors of REALTOR® magazine. Read more >

Subscribe To This Blog