According to a new study published by the Keller Center for Residential Real Estate Sales & Marketing at Baylor University's Hankamer School of Business lead generation tactics need to reflect market conditions. In his article, "Lead Generation: What Really Works?," Dr. Chris Pullig, director of the Keller Center, reports that strength of market and lead conversion strategy have a complex nonlinear relationship. Lead Generation techniques were categorized as 'seek' or a proactive approach - telephone calls, networking, or referrals - or as 'attract' or marketing strategy employing tactics such as advertising or direct mail and then waiting for the phone to ring.
The survey found that in a "stable" market, a balanced approach appears best in lead conversion. That is, an approach that is about 50% "seek" and 50% "attract" results in the greatest percentage of leads being converted to an appointment and a transaction. When the market is "tough," agents should switch to a more seek-oriented strategy with a ratio of approximately 60% to 40% in seek vs. attract. And when the market is "healthy," a strategy that is more "attract" oriented is best. Marketing your properties in a more traditional way (i.e., advertising) with less focus on seek strategies may be more appropriate when the market is more healthy.
What do individuals doing well in a tough market do differently than their peers?
According to the report,
[They] report significantly higher conversion rates to appointments (54% vs. 43%) and closure to a transaction (52% vs. 42%). They also spend significantly more on their Internet/Website lead generation activities (18% vs. 12%) and IVR Technology (3% vs. 0.5%). These individuals also report significantly less spending in Signage (9% vs. 12%) and Open House activities (5% vs. 9%) when compared to those who are not doing as well. And, these individuals report that they are more "seek" oriented than their peers.